Ken Lyen's Home
Ken's Links
London Revisited 2000
Letter from London 2006
Singapore Musical Theatre
Making the Grade
Writing Musicals
Musicals from Movies
Fred Ebb
The Story of Chess
Mama Mia
Bad Vibrations
Chestnuts 2003
Chestnuts 2004
Chestnuts 2005
Incubating New Musicals
List of Musicals on Film
Is Musical Theatre Dead?
Is Classical Music Dead?
Is Poetry Dead?
Why Read Poetry?
New Words
Nothing's Wrong
Hippie Dictionary
Singlish Dictionary
Blog Dictionary
Best of the Best
English Spoke
Reading in Decline
Too Many Books
Magic of Reading
Pablo Neruda
Graphic Novels
Writers Bar
Lost For Words
Encyclopedia Wars
Library in Cyberspace
The Bridge
Growing A Film Industry
Great Levellers
Rote Rites and Rongs
Beautiful Minds
Create Talented Individuals?
Rise of the Creative Class
Perchance to Dream
Children's EQ
Gifted Education
Gifted Children
Mozart Effect
Confucius and Multiple Intelligences
Predicting Your Future
Mistyping Personality
Messy Homes
Does Age Matter?
Too Young for Philosophy?
Philosopher for Hire
Deconstructing Derrida
University Quotas
Ranking Universities
University Ranking Continued
The Future of Universities
If Thine Eye Offends Thee
If It Ain't Broke
New Exams for Old!
Too Many Test
The Sincerest Form of Flattery
Childhood Memories
Signs of Success
Follow Your Dreams
First Impressions
Handphone Etiquette
Handphones Silenced
Apple Of My i
Sex and the Media
The Greeks
Geographic Clangers
Domino Theory
Hello Kitty
Heels on Wheels
What a Racket!
Potty Training
Skip to the Loo
Corporal Punishment
Is Modern Art Rubbish?
Mona Lisa Grins
Sunday in the Park
Vision and Art
Spam Glorious Spam!
Humble Pie
Sour Grapes?
Murphy's Law Calculator
Perfect Search
False Logic
Noah's Ark
Who Discovered America?
Palaces of Dictators
Joys of Stress
Games Academics Play
Virtual Reality Treatmemt
Autistic Underconnectivity
Asperger Syndrome
Pay Attention!
Attention Deficit
Speech Delay
Almost Normal
Prozac Nation
Gilles de la Tourette
Singapore Medicine
Virtual Dissection
War Against Malaria
Into the Frying Pan
Back to Methuselah
Poetic Medicine
Far Eastern Economic Review
History of the Singapore Musical
My Research
Singapore Idle
Best Countries
Brain Drain
Greatest Happiness
Remaking Singapore
Singapore Nobel Prize
Singapore MRT Map
National Day
Caste System
Doctors' Fees
Leadership and Teambuilding
Doctor Do-Much
Play it Again, Doc
A Dose of Music
Prescription for the Heart
Multiple Personality
Fly By Night
Rape of Nanking
Iris Chang
Anne Frank
Angela's Ashes
The Notebook
Hollywood Insider
Fahrenheit 9/11 Pirates
The Front
The Barbarian Invasions
Les Choristes
The Return
Road Home
Farewell My Concubine
So You Want to be a Nurse
School House Rockz
Makan Place
e-mail me

What a Racket!


What a Racket!

by Kenneth Lyen

I play tennis twice a week. Not very well. But I’m a minor fanatic, and even light rain will not dampen my spirits.

I watch all the great tennis players and imagine that maybe I could play like them. Of course simply upgrading my racket would definitely improve my play!

I started with a wooden racket. It was heavy and clumsy, and it made the ball go all over the place. Then came the steel racket, which Jimmy Connors used in the late 1960s, winning Wimbledon with it.

The real breakthrough came when Howard Head, an engineer, developed an aluminium racket which was marketed as the Prince in 1976. There were two major improvements.

Firstly it was lighter. Although the older and heavier rackets allowed for more power with less effort, the lighter racket gave players greater maneuverability and better control over their shots. The new frames had to balance between rigidity and flexibility. Stiffer frames gave the strokes greater power by keeping the head more rigid. But flexible frames absorbed shock better, had less vibration, and thereby reduced the incidence of tennis elbows. Aluminium had just the right balance.

Secondly, the hitting area was increased to 130 square inches. Players also found that the greater surface area of the racket head meant that there were fewer misses.

Machiavelli might even have approved of this racket!

Everyone went out and bought one. But not me. I couldn’t afford it.

It was around this time that the popularity of tennis skyrocketed to well over 25 million players worldwide by 1993. Earnings for top tennis players has also streaked upwards. Top seeded Roger Federer of Switzerland earned $4.7 million, and second seed Andy Roddick of the United States earned $2.1 million in 2003.

Not content, Howard Head experimented with different materials. He tried fiberglass, boron, graphite, and Kevlar. The latter is a flexible lightweight fiberglass five times stronger than steel, and used in bullet resistant vests.

Technology was revolutionizing tennis. There were a few diehards, including John McEnroe who became the last person to use a wooden racket at Wimbledon in 1982. Indeed when Bjorn Borg used a wooden racket, he lost most of his games. By 1990s, there was only one manufacturer left making wooden rackets.

The newer materials increased the velocity of the shots by up to 30%. Serves were now routinely exceeding 100 miles per hour. This has led to a rather boring style of tennis comprising devastating serves and volley, as played by Bjorn Borg, Pete Sampras, and Andy Roddick. Indeed Andy Roddick’s best serve is 153 miles per hour. The Guinness Book of World Records lists William Tatem Tilden (1893-1953) to have the fastest service ever measured, of 163.6 miles per hour in 1931.

When Head introduced an even lighter weight titanium racket containing lightweight graphite fibers in 1998, I succumbed to peer pressure and bought one, despite its exorbitant cost. My playing should have improved, but unfortunately my opponents also bought the same titanium racket, thereby negating any advantage I would have accrued from this purchase.

In 1999 Wilson introduced a new racket made with a material called Hyper Carbon. This was an ultrahigh-modulus carbon fiber: 4 times stiffer, 65 percent lighter and 4 times stronger than most popular tennis racket materials.

Recently, Head has announced a new Liquid Metal racket comprising titanium mixed with carbon fibers, said to have better characteristics, including better shock absorption. The verdict for this racket is still out.

To my dismay, I have discovered that buying new rackets over the years, has not really helped my play. Perhaps psychologically I feel more confident. But this has only helped a smidgen. Nah, I won’t bother upgrading to this new technology. Not unless I’m convinced it will improve my play.

"Pardon, it will improve my play, you say? Mmm, do you trade old rackets for new?"