Ken Lyen's Home
About
Ken's Links
Hakkas
London Revisited 2000
Letter from London 2006
Singapore Musical Theatre
Making the Grade
Exodus
Other
Writing Musicals
Musicals from Movies
Fred Ebb
The Story of Chess
Mama Mia
Bad Vibrations
Chestnuts 2003
Chestnuts 2004
Chestnuts 2005
Incubating New Musicals
List of Musicals on Film
Is Musical Theatre Dead?
Is Classical Music Dead?
Is Poetry Dead?
Why Read Poetry?
Etymology
New Words
Cull
Nothing's Wrong
Hippie Dictionary
Singlish Dictionary
Blog Dictionary
Best of the Best
English Spoke
Bilingualism
Reading in Decline
Too Many Books
Magic of Reading
Pablo Neruda
Graphic Novels
Writers Bar
Lost For Words
Encyclopedia Wars
Library in Cyberspace
The Bridge
Growing A Film Industry
Critics
Great Levellers
Rote Rites and Rongs
Beautiful Minds
Intelligence
Creativity
Create Talented Individuals?
Rise of the Creative Class
Perchance to Dream
Children's EQ
Gifted Education
Gifted Children
Mozart Effect
Confucius and Multiple Intelligences
Predicting Your Future
Mistyping Personality
Messy Homes
Does Age Matter?
Too Young for Philosophy?
Philosopher for Hire
Deconstructing Derrida
University Quotas
Ranking Universities
University Ranking Continued
The Future of Universities
If Thine Eye Offends Thee
If It Ain't Broke
New Exams for Old!
Too Many Test
The Sincerest Form of Flattery
Childhood Memories
Voluntarism
Signs of Success
Follow Your Dreams
First Impressions
Handphone Etiquette
Handphones Silenced
Nanotechnology
Apple Of My i
Sex and the Media
The Greeks
Geographic Clangers
Domino Theory
Hello Kitty
Heels on Wheels
What a Racket!
Potty Training
Skip to the Loo
Corporal Punishment
Is Modern Art Rubbish?
Mona Lisa Grins
Vermeer
Sunday in the Park
Vision and Art
Fake
Gmail
Spam Glorious Spam!
Humble Pie
Sour Grapes?
Murphy's Law Calculator
Perfect Search
False Logic
Noah's Ark
Who Discovered America?
Palaces of Dictators
Queues
Backup
Joys of Stress
Games Academics Play
Virtual Reality Treatmemt
Autism
Autistic Underconnectivity
Asperger Syndrome
Pay Attention!
Attention Deficit
Dyslexia
Speech Delay
Almost Normal
Prozac Nation
Gilles de la Tourette
Singapore Medicine
Ignorance
Virtual Dissection
War Against Malaria
Into the Frying Pan
Back to Methuselah
Poetic Medicine
Cigarettes
Far Eastern Economic Review
History of the Singapore Musical
My Research
Singapore Idle
Best Countries
Brain Drain
Greatest Happiness
Remaking Singapore
Singapore Nobel Prize
Singapore MRT Map
National Day
Caste System
Doctors' Fees
Leadership and Teambuilding
Doctor Do-Much
Interview
Play it Again, Doc
A Dose of Music
Prescription for the Heart
Multiple Personality
Sayang
Fly By Night
Muggle
Rape of Nanking
Iris Chang
Anne Frank
Angela's Ashes
The Notebook
Hollywood Insider
Fahrenheit 9/11 Pirates
The Front
The Barbarian Invasions
Les Choristes
The Return
Road Home
Shower
2046
Farewell My Concubine
So You Want to be a Nurse
Roulette
Fences
School House Rockz
Makan Place
e-mail me

Is Poetry Dead?


 

Is Poetry Dead?

by Kenneth Lyen

Poetry is dead! Long live poetry!

Last year Bruce Wexler wrote an article in Newsweek entitled "Poetry is Dead. Does Anybody Really Care?" "Poetry," he said, "is designed for an era when people valued the written word and had the time and inclination to possess it in its highest form," but people no longer have "the patience to read a poem 20 times before the sound and sense of it takes hold. They aren't willing to let the words wash over them like a wave, demanding instead for the meaning to flow clearly and quickly. They want narrative-driven forms, stand-alone art that doesn't require an understanding of the larger context."

Was Wexler only referring to America? Here in Singapore, poetry is not as healthy as we think. There are warning signs that it may also be dying, and unless we do something about it, it will soon be on the critical list. Wait any longer, and the only thing that will save it will be mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

Recently I've been asking my friends whether or not they read poetry. Almost none of them did on their own initiative. The only ones who read poetry were either writers like myself, or school kids who read poetry given to them by their teachers, but this was pretty rare. What surprised me was the recurring question asked by those who did not read poetry: "What's the benefit of reading poetry?"

This reminded me of a former Vice-Chancellor of the University of Singapore, who asked professorial heads to justify the existence of their department. The School of Engineering, for example, had no difficulty justifying its existence because it generated students who would become economically productive. Medicine could argue that a country needs healthy individuals for the workforce. Law could claim that you need lawyers to secure contracts. But as one went down the roll call, certain department heads began to feel a distinct chill, reminiscent of a McCarthy-style witch-hunt.

How would a department of History or Literature be able to justify their existence? According to the bureaucrats, surely they do not produce graduates that would benefit our economy. Other than becoming teachers and journalists, what other jobs could they possibly be fit for?

In a sense this view of History and Literature as second class subjects has not entirely been dissipated here in Singapore, I have recently spoken to students who have been discouraged from taking Literature by their school teachers. And if it were not for the intervention of our about-to-be-installed new Prime Minister, History would surely have been jettisoned.

Let me return to poetry. It seems awfully curious to me as to why one needs to justify why one should read poetry. My glib retort would be to say that it's the same reason why you listen to music: poetry touches those parts that other art forms do not touch (apologies to Heineken Beer).

But in a more serious vein, the question that lies behind "Why do you read poetry", is "What is your philosophy of life? Do you eat to live, or live to eat?"

To justify to a bureaucrat why one should read poetry, one needs to think like a bureaucrat. The buzz-word of the moment is "creativity". Hence my first reason to justify the reading (and writing) of poetry is that it fosters creativity. It helps you think "out of the box", another useful catchphrase often used by present-day bureaucrats. It produces a "vibrant society", a "renaissance city". Poetry helps you think better... but maybe I should not push my luck on this.

Economic justification of poetry might go along the following lines. Poetry can be useful for certain industries. For example the greeting card industry would benefit from an army of poets. As would the songwriting industry, as the lyrics would help propel a song into profitability. Marginally, one could argue that poetry could help you write better. But this may be debatable, as the counter-argument is that doing crossword puzzles could be even more beneficial.

Lastly, and almost as an afterthought, I would stutter hesitatingly that perhaps, just perhaps, poetry might possibly help you become more open, more sensitive, more appreciative of our world, our feelings, our philosophies. That perhaps this tapestry of words can enrich our lives. Let me quote an extract from a poem by my friend and poet, Felix Cheong:

"No, poetry is more than the skill
of lying in wait
for the swish of an image,
keeping faith till it hooks
truth, triumphant and brief
from the muddy pool that is life."

  -  from "The One That Got Away" by Felix Cheong

Felix wrote to me and said, "No, poetry isn't dead, just dormant." Perhaps in Singapore, the best way of elevating the status of poetry, is the top-down approach. We need to elect a poet prime minister, damn it! Any volunteers?