Ken Lyen's Home
About
Ken's Links
Hakkas
London Revisited 2000
Letter from London 2006
Singapore Musical Theatre
Making the Grade
Exodus
Other
Writing Musicals
Musicals from Movies
Fred Ebb
The Story of Chess
Mama Mia
Bad Vibrations
Chestnuts 2003
Chestnuts 2004
Chestnuts 2005
Incubating New Musicals
List of Musicals on Film
Is Musical Theatre Dead?
Is Classical Music Dead?
Is Poetry Dead?
Why Read Poetry?
Etymology
New Words
Cull
Nothing's Wrong
Hippie Dictionary
Singlish Dictionary
Blog Dictionary
Best of the Best
English Spoke
Bilingualism
Reading in Decline
Too Many Books
Magic of Reading
Pablo Neruda
Graphic Novels
Writers Bar
Lost For Words
Encyclopedia Wars
Library in Cyberspace
The Bridge
Growing A Film Industry
Critics
Great Levellers
Rote Rites and Rongs
Beautiful Minds
Intelligence
Creativity
Create Talented Individuals?
Rise of the Creative Class
Perchance to Dream
Children's EQ
Gifted Education
Gifted Children
Mozart Effect
Confucius and Multiple Intelligences
Predicting Your Future
Mistyping Personality
Messy Homes
Does Age Matter?
Too Young for Philosophy?
Philosopher for Hire
Deconstructing Derrida
University Quotas
Ranking Universities
University Ranking Continued
The Future of Universities
If Thine Eye Offends Thee
If It Ain't Broke
New Exams for Old!
Too Many Test
The Sincerest Form of Flattery
Childhood Memories
Voluntarism
Signs of Success
Follow Your Dreams
First Impressions
Handphone Etiquette
Handphones Silenced
Nanotechnology
Apple Of My i
Sex and the Media
The Greeks
Geographic Clangers
Domino Theory
Hello Kitty
Heels on Wheels
What a Racket!
Potty Training
Skip to the Loo
Corporal Punishment
Is Modern Art Rubbish?
Mona Lisa Grins
Vermeer
Sunday in the Park
Vision and Art
Fake
Gmail
Spam Glorious Spam!
Humble Pie
Sour Grapes?
Murphy's Law Calculator
Perfect Search
False Logic
Noah's Ark
Who Discovered America?
Palaces of Dictators
Queues
Backup
Joys of Stress
Games Academics Play
Virtual Reality Treatmemt
Autism
Autistic Underconnectivity
Asperger Syndrome
Pay Attention!
Attention Deficit
Dyslexia
Speech Delay
Almost Normal
Prozac Nation
Gilles de la Tourette
Singapore Medicine
Ignorance
Virtual Dissection
War Against Malaria
Into the Frying Pan
Back to Methuselah
Poetic Medicine
Cigarettes
Far Eastern Economic Review
History of the Singapore Musical
My Research
Singapore Idle
Best Countries
Brain Drain
Greatest Happiness
Remaking Singapore
Singapore Nobel Prize
Singapore MRT Map
National Day
Caste System
Doctors' Fees
Leadership and Teambuilding
Doctor Do-Much
Interview
Play it Again, Doc
A Dose of Music
Prescription for the Heart
Multiple Personality
Sayang
Fly By Night
Muggle
Rape of Nanking
Iris Chang
Anne Frank
Angela's Ashes
The Notebook
Hollywood Insider
Fahrenheit 9/11 Pirates
The Front
The Barbarian Invasions
Les Choristes
The Return
Road Home
Shower
2046
Farewell My Concubine
So You Want to be a Nurse
Roulette
Fences
School House Rockz
Makan Place
e-mail me

Is Modern Art Rubbish?


 

Is Modern Art Rubbish?

by Kenneth Lyen

In 1917 Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968) shocked the art world by displaying a urinal in a New York art exhibition. The organisers convened an emergency meeting and voted to remove the "immoral" and "unoriginal" object from the exhibition. Whether or not this object is a work of art remains controversial even today, but it had a powerful effect in challenging us to reexamine our beliefs, "What is art?"

Throughout history, pioneers have often been the centre of controversy because they challenge established orthodoxy. Marcel Duchamp was not the first and certainly not the last.

The impressionists and post-impressionists were the iconoclasts of their day. Even a painter like Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890) was not appreciated, for he never sold a single painting during his lifetime, except those "bought" by his own brother who took pity on him.

Pablo Picasso (1881-1973) also shocked the establishment with his highly distorted images of women.

Jackson Pollock (1912-1956) provoked ridicule with his splash paintings, and he was nicknamed "Jack the Dripper".

The Tate Gallery in London is certainly no stranger to controversy, in large part due to their staunch support of avant garde art. In 1966 the Gallery bought a large comic based painting by Roy Lichtenstein (1923-1997) entitled "Whaam!" The New York Times art critic described Lichtenstein as "one of the worst artists in America." His paintings of blown-up comic strips have been disparaged as cheap advertisements and merely tedious copies of the banal.

In 1976 the Tate Gallery was the centre of another controversy. They bought a sculpture by Carl Andre (1935- ) called "Equivalent VIII" in 1972. It was on display for four years before it caught the attention of The Sunday Times. The work, which consisted of 120 firebricks arranged in a rectangular formation, provoked an almighty uproar. The Tate was ridiculed by the public who saw the curators as being hoodwinked into buying "a pile of bricks".

On 27 August 2004, the Tate Gallery came into the news again. This time one of the gallery’s cleaners accidentally threw out a bag of rubbish which formed part of an artwork. The bag of rubbish was transparent, filled with newspapers, cardboard and other bits of paper. It is actually the work of artist Gustav Metzger (1926 - ), entitled "Recreation Of First Public Demonstration Of Auto-Destructive Art." The mistake was quickly realised, but unfortunately it had already been crushed by the Gallery’s crusher. And when fished out from the machine, Metzger declared that it was beyond rescue. The Guardian newspaper’s tongue-in-cheek headline was "How auto-destructive art work got destroyed too soon"!

My philistine friends would convulse in hysterical laughter and gibe: "All modern art is rubbish!"